Does this apply if I am not an influencer?
Yes, and often more so. A chief executive, a lawyer who appears in the press a lot or an expert with a book sits just as firmly in the answers as a creator with a million followers — they just know it less often. Anyone public without treating it as a trade rarely checks whether it holds up.
| Who | Who decides | What keeps them up at night |
|---|---|---|
| Creator | The creator themselves, sometimes with a manager | Brand safety, and whether anything gets made or only measured |
| Public figure — chief executive, expert, known name | The person themselves, with whoever handles communications | Reputation, misquotes, and being mixed up with a namesake |
| Influencer or talent agency | Agency management | Watching twenty reputations at once, and one incident rubbing off on the rest |
How does an AI arrive at a judgement about me as a person?
From four kinds of signal, and the order surprises most people. What you publish yourself weighs least; what others write about you and what gets said in communities weighs most. An engine treats your own channel as an interested source, and that is what it is.
| Driver | What ceeme measures underneath | What stays dark without a connection |
|---|---|---|
| Reputation risk | misquotes, sliding reviews and where they come from | Reviews and social are read live. Print and paywalled media are not in there. |
| Public social signals | what is publicly out there about you, and whether it moves | We count what is public. Numbers behind a login need you to connect the account. |
| Community signals | what forums and groups are saying about you | We read Reddit and the forums broadly, not exhaustively — that needs its own adapter. |
| Sentiment / framing | the role you get cast in — the cheap one, the safe one, the fast one | We measure the framing per answer and break it out per source — so you see which source carries the picture. |
| Hallucination risk | invented and outdated facts about you, counted by type | We see what an engine invents about you, and we follow the media coverage around it through the press feed. |
| Entity confusion | how often you get mixed up with a namesake | Fixing a mix-up at an outside source is human work — we find it, someone writes to the source. |
| Governance risk | who may publish what, and whether it can be undone | We show who may do what. Enforcing it per channel needs an operator flag and an adapter. |
Do you read my numbers behind the login?
Only if you connect them, and that is optional. Without a connection we count what is public — and for the question "how am I framed" that is enough, because a sponsor sees only that too. Numbers behind a login help with the other question: whether what you publish lands.
| Source | Kind |
|---|---|
| TikTok | public — we read it, you connect nothing |
| public — we read it, you connect nothing | |
| YouTube | public — we read it, you connect nothing |
| X | public — we read it, you connect nothing |
| Reddit and communities | public — we read it, you connect nothing |
| press and news | public — we read it, you connect nothing |
| public — we read it, you connect nothing | |
| Wikidata/Wikipedia | public — we read it, you connect nothing |
| communities | public — we read it, you connect nothing |
| social insights (optional) | connected — only after your approval, read-only unless agreed otherwise |
| YouTube Analytics (optional) | connected — only after your approval, read-only unless agreed otherwise |
| press feed | connected — only after your approval, read-only unless agreed otherwise |
| social insights | connected — only after your approval, read-only unless agreed otherwise |
| YouTube Analytics | connected — only after your approval, read-only unless agreed otherwise |
Can you make an old incident disappear?
Disappearing, no, and anyone promising it is lying. What is possible is measuring how often it still tags along, which source keeps it alive, and whether anything sits beside it that puts it in proportion. Usually the answer is that little else has been written about you since — and that is fixable, slowly.
| Rule | Kind |
|---|---|
| By default we write nothing in your name. You get the finding, the source and a response tip — publishing is your voice. | hard rule — the build refuses output that crosses it |
| No bought replies, no inflated reach, no accounts meant to suggest support. | forbidden — we do not do this, not even on request |
| No manufactured support and no orchestrated replies — it is the one thing that genuinely makes an incident worse the moment anyone spots it. | hard rule — the build refuses output that crosses it |
| Every claim carries its source. What has no source enters neither a report nor a response frame. | hard rule — the build refuses output that crosses it |
| Nothing goes out without the person authorised to sign off at your organisation having seen it — the flow sits in the code, not in an understanding. | hard rule — the build refuses output that crosses it |
| Engagement or reviews that do not come from a human are nowhere produced, bought or recommended. | forbidden — we do not do this, not even on request |
| Every claim carries its source. What has no source is not written — not even when it looks true. | forbidden — we do not do this, not even on request |
| We neither track nor write anything about an opponent — that builds material whose only use is campaigning. | forbidden — we do not do this, not even on request |
I represent twenty creators. How do I keep that manageable?
With one overview where each person has their own framing and their own open findings, and one place where the incidents converge. What an agency needs is not twenty reports but one question answered: who needs attention today, and why.
Frequently asked questions
An AI confuses me with someone else of the same name. Can that be fixed?
Often yes, and it is one of the most rewarding fixes there is. Mix-ups almost always come from one place where your two names sit close together with nothing distinguishing them — a sector listing, an old news page. What helps is making yourself unambiguous in the places an engine uses as an identity source.
Do you write my response when something goes wrong?
By default no, and that is a choice rather than a limitation. Your voice is your product; a response that does not sound like you does more damage than the incident. What you get is what is factually there, where it came from, and whether responding makes it bigger or smaller — that last call says "smaller by doing nothing" more often than people expect.
How completely do you see the communities?
Broadly, not exhaustively, and the table above says so. We read Reddit and the large forums; full coverage needs a dedicated adapter that does not exist yet. What is closed we do not read at all — no scraper, no route. A monitoring system that acts as if it sees everything makes you read silence as absence.
Read on
Free, no account and no card.