In short
- Aggregated
- Per sector, never per company. An individual score belongs in a file and not on a website.
- No edition yet
- There is no table with empty rows here. No measurement, no table — the same rule as elsewhere.
- What is here
- Which sectors already have their rules written, because without rules an average is rudderless.
Why is there not a single figure on this page yet?
Because a table with "coming soon" in every cell looks like a measurement that already exists. That is the form of claim this site makes nowhere: there is no column waiting to be filled with an outcome, because as long as that outcome does not exist the table reads as a promise with a layout around it.
What will stand here once the first edition is measured: per sector which names recur across many questions, and which kind of source the assistant leaned on most often. That second one is the more usable for a reader, because you cannot take over a name and you can take over a source type.
For which sectors do the rules already exist?
For the eight below, and that is a condition rather than a detail. An aggregated figure without a rule pack adds apples to pears: what is a forbidden formulation in healthcare is an ordinary claim in construction. The sector determines what a good outcome is even allowed to be.
| Sector | The question measured there |
|---|---|
| Why does ChatGPT recommend a shop nearby and not mine? | Local Proof is the measurement for businesses that live off their neighbourhood: ceeme asks the questions a customer in your town actually puts to an AI assistant, checks whether your name lands in the answer, and traces that answer back to the sources the engine fetched — your Google profile, your reviews, the guides you are in or missing from. |
| Is a doctor or lawyer allowed to be recommended by AI? | Practice Trust is the measurement for practices bound by a professional code: ceeme looks at what AI assistants say about your practice, measures whether that is accurate, and only generates output that clears a rulepack — your profession's rules sit in the code, not in a warning afterwards. |
| Best way for an SME to overtake a competitor in AI answers? | KMO Signal Ops is the measurement for companies sold on expertise: ceeme asks the questions a buyer or a searching business owner puts to an AI assistant, counts separately how often you get named, cited and chosen against the names that land beside you, and shows for each gap which source carried it. |
| Who is liable for what AI says about our hospital? | Care Trust Ops is the measurement for hospitals, clinics and care homes: ceeme tracks what AI assistants say about your services, departments and practical information, reports every gap with reality as a finding with its source, and routes every correction through an approval flow with an audit trail. |
| Is a school allowed to have AI answers about it corrected? | School Trust is the measurement for schools and training providers: ceeme asks the questions a parent or a prospective student puts to an AI assistant, checks whether the answer matches your own information about programmes, conditions and dates, and also measures whether the website meets the accessibility standards an educational institution is required to meet. |
| What does it cost to get wrong information about a public service out of AI answers? | Public Trust Ops is the measurement for cities, municipalities, agencies and utilities: ceeme asks the questions a resident puts to an AI assistant about your procedures and services, reports every gap with the official information as a finding with its source, and delivers factual corrections only — political or party content is forbidden in the code. |
| What is the difference between AI visibility and running a campaign? | Civic Signal is the measurement for office-holders, ministerial teams and parliamentary groups: ceeme tracks what AI assistants and the press say about a person or a topic, reports misquotes and invented statements as findings with their source, and supplies factual response frames only — campaign, persuasion and opponent content are forbidden in the code, and that is not a house rule but a block. |
| Which sources and reviews does AI use when it talks about my brand? | Creator Signal is the measurement for people who are public without a mandate — creators, experts, chief executives and the agencies representing them: ceeme tracks what AI assistants, social platforms and communities say about a person, measures how they are framed, and reports misquotes and mix-ups with a namesake as findings with their source. |
Are you allowed to publish which companies an AI names?
What an assistant answers is a public statement: anyone can ask the question and read the same thing. Publishing an aggregated observation about it is therefore allowed, and it is something other than keeping a file on a named company — we do not do the latter, and that is a boundary and not a technical limit.
So there will be no league table of winners and losers on this page. Who comes out on top is a snapshot about a company that did not ask for it, and it is besides the least usable form: there is nothing to do with it except be annoyed by it.
Can I already find out where my own company stands?
Yes, and there is no need to wait for an edition. A measurement on your own name takes less time than reading this page and gives you something a sector average never gives: the questions you are absent from, and the sources the assistant read instead.
Frequently asked questions
How often does a new edition appear?
When enough has been measured to tell a shift from noise, and not on a fixed day. Promising a monthly rhythm and then publishing an edition in which nothing changed turns an observatory into a calendar.
Can my company ask to be left out?
No company names will appear on this page, so the question disappears along with the setup. What will appear is which kind of source carries weight per sector — information everyone in that sector can use, including those not named in it.
Read on
Free, no account and no card.