What exactly can a connection do?
Eight things, and an adapter declares for itself which of them it can handle. If a fix asks for something the connection cannot do, nothing happens — it is not half-applied and not quietly skipped, but refused with the reason attached.
| Capability | What a connection can do with it |
|---|---|
| code_update | change source code and templates |
| content_update | place visible text and blocks |
| metadata | title, description, canonical, hreflang |
| structured_data | JSON-LD and schema.org |
| publish | put it live |
| preview | show before → after before anything happens |
| verify | check afterwards that the change actually landed |
| rollback | roll back to the previous version |
Which platforms does this work on today?
Counted honestly: of the 23 platforms in the catalogue, 1 is "supported", 16 are "beta" and 6 are "planned". Supported means the adapter exists and is tested. Beta means it exists and the wiring is still being built. Planned means the architecture covers it and the adapter is still to be written.
| Status | Count | What that means |
|---|---|---|
| supported | 1 | adapter present and tested |
| beta | 16 | adapter present, wiring still being built |
| planned | 6 | architecture covers it, adapter still to be written — you get the exact instruction |
How do you stop something going live unintentionally?
By leaving it shut by default. Execution is a switch that is off, goes on per platform, and only works for targets on a list. On top of that come approval per action type and a lock that stops two jobs working on the same file at once.
And if my platform is not in the list?
Then you get the fix as an exact instruction or as a ready-to-paste builder prompt: precisely what goes where, in what form, with the reason attached. That is not a consolation prize — it is the same change set, only you place it. Anyone on a closed no-code platform ends up here anyway.
Frequently asked questions
Does ceeme make changes without asking me?
No. Autonomous apply is off, and approval is arranged per action type: the kind of change decides whether it may go automatically, not the project or the hurry. What is always allowed is preview — it has no side effects.
Can you break something on my site?
Every change has a preview up front, a verification afterwards and a rollback if that verification fails. On top of that the gate is shut by default and execution only works on targets you allowed yourself. The risk is never zero, which is why the way back is always there.
Does this work with my CMS too?
That depends on what the connection can do, not on the name of the CMS. The engine looks at abilities — can it place schema, can it publish, can it roll back — and cleanly refuses whatever does not fit. If your platform is still planned, you get the exact instruction.
What is on record about what happened?
The whole path: which change, on which target, with which approval, what the verification said and whether it was rolled back. That is not there for the statistics but for the moment someone asks who published what, and when.
Read on
Free, no account and no card.