In short
- Peec AI
- A Berlin measurement tool for AI visibility, strong on sentiment scoring and source analysis per URL.
- sentiment scoring
- Not just whether you appear in an AI answer, but in what terms you are described.
- execution
- Actually applying a fix to your site or channel, instead of recommending it. This is the dividing line between the two.
What is the difference between ceeme and Peec AI?
| ceeme | Peec AI | |
|---|---|---|
| In short | Measure, then actually do it | Measuring and scoring. Nothing more |
| Who it is for | Freelancer, SME, group, agency or enterprise — from self-service to bespoke | Marketing teams, brands and agencies |
| Getting started | Free scan, no account and no card | 7-day free trial, no credit card |
| Price | Free scan · DeepScan from €490 · subscription from €79/month | Starter €89/month for 50 prompts and 3 of the 7 models, up to Enterprise from €499/month |
| What it does | Measure, report, fix and execute — with an approval gate before anything is published | Measuring and reporting. Nothing is executed, and they present it that way |
| Which engines | The engines that matter for your market and language — not a list to show off with | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, Gemini and Grok — three at a time on self-serve, around eleven on Enterprise |
| Fixes | Exact fixes inside the product, and execution within scope with approval and rollback | Recommendations; you apply them yourself |
| Follow-up | Live dashboard, weekly retest on the same prompt set, competitors included | Daily tracking, sentiment scoring, share of voice and unlimited seats |
| Traffic and attribution | GA4, Search Console and Looker Studio where available; also which AI sends visitors | Looker Studio on the higher tiers, plus source analysis per URL |
| Language | Site in nl, fr, en, de; scan, report and dashboard in nl, fr, en, de or es — written per language, not translated | Multilingual tracking in more than fourteen languages, at country level |
| Breadth of the review | Technical, design trust, data consistency, Google Business Profile and agent-readiness | Focused on measuring AI visibility, and that is where it ends |
Data on Peec AI: checked against their public website in July 2026. Something no longer accurate? Email us and we will fix it.
Where is Peec AI stronger than ceeme?
- Sentiment scoring on a finer scale than ours, updated daily and shown as a headline measure. We measure it in three values — positive, neutral, negative — and do not put it up front. On granularity and visibility, they win this.
- Daily tracking rather than weekly. For a brand that can end up in the news, that is a real difference.
- Unlimited seats from the first paid tier onward. An agency of eight pays what an agency of one pays.
- Source analysis per URL: which page of yours gets cited, and which of your competitor's. That is clean, usable data.
- Rated highly by the people who use it daily — 4.9 out of 5 on G2 in July 2026, among agencies tracking many brands at once.
How does ceeme differ from Peec AI?
- Peec stops at the recommendation. That is not a complaint — they say so themselves — but it means the distance between knowing and changing stays with you.
- We count mentioned, cited and chosen separately rather than pouring them into one score. A 30% share of voice does not tell you whether you are named but not chosen, or the other way round, and those are two completely different problems.
- With Peec the tier decides how many models you may measure at once. With us your market decides, and the weighting is published with its source and month.
- Our review also covers technical health, design trust, data consistency and your Google Business Profile — the things that explain why an engine skips you.
Why does an AI name your competitor and not you?
A tracking tool stops at step three. We keep step two, and that is why step four exists.
- The prompt
- A real customer question, without your brand name in it.
- The answer
- What the engine says — and which sources it fetched for it.
- The finding
- "You are called the cheap option" or "this is factually wrong".
- The source
- Which page produced that framing. That is the fix — an address, not a number.
Measuring or fixing — which do you need?
If your question is "how am I being talked about", Peec is stronger than we are and I would take it. If your question is "why am I not being chosen and what do I do about it", Peec stops where ceeme starts. The two do not exclude each other either: some customers use Peec for tracking and ceeme for the fixes and the proof.
Frequently asked questions
Does ceeme do sentiment too?
Yes, but differently. For every answer we record whether the framing is positive, neutral or negative, plus the caveat the engine attaches to you — and, this is the point, the sources behind that answer. That turns "you get called the cheap option" into an address instead of a number. On a fine scale and a daily figure Peec wins; on what you can do with it, no.
Is €89 a month more or less than ceeme?
More than our entry point: Watch Core costs €79 a month and the scan before it is free. If you want execution, it flips: ceeme costs more then, because you are buying work rather than a dashboard.
Can I move from Peec to ceeme with my prompts?
Yes, and it is advisable: asking the same prompts again is the only way to see whether anything really changes. Do expect the numbers not to line up exactly — an engine never answers twice identically, and that holds for any measurement system.
Read on
Free, no account and no card.